Hackham vs Onkaparinga Hills SA
Two South Australia suburbs, about 1.8 km apart, side by side — straight from the official numbers.
The numbers
| Hackham | Onkaparinga Hills | |
|---|---|---|
| Population (2021) | 4,491 | 2,610 |
| Median age | 40 | 45 |
| Median house price | $770,500 | $996,750 |
| Median rent (weekly) | $297 | $385 |
| Owner-occupied | 75% | 95% |
| Family households | 65% | 87% |
| SEIFA advantage (decile of 10) | 1 | 7 |
| Tree canopy | 12% | 38% |
| Population 2011 | 4,103 | 2,534 |
What stands out
Onkaparinga Hills's median house price is about 29% above Hackham's.
Hackham rents cheaper — $297 vs $385 a week at the census.
Onkaparinga Hills ranks higher on the SEIFA advantage scale (decile 7 vs 1).
Onkaparinga Hills is the greener of the two (38% vs 12% tree canopy).
Growth since 2011: Hackham +9%, Onkaparinga Hills +3%.
In short
On the median house price Hackham is the cheaper of the two, $770,500 against $996,750. The two sit about 1.8 km apart in a straight line, both in South Australia.
Share this comparison: X · Facebook · LinkedIn · or link it: https://suburby.com.au/compare/sa/hackham-vs-onkaparinga-hills