Bateman vs Murdoch WA
Two Western Australia suburbs, about 1.6 km apart, side by side — straight from the official numbers.
The numbers
| Bateman | Murdoch | |
|---|---|---|
| Population (2021) | 3,832 | 3,352 |
| Median age | 41 | 43 |
| Median rent (weekly) | $420 | $445 |
| Owner-occupied | 79% | 60% |
| Family households | 81% | 68% |
| SEIFA advantage (decile of 10) | 10 | 7 |
| Tree canopy | 8% | 20% |
| Population 2011 | 3,737 | 3,325 |
What stands out
Bateman rents cheaper — $420 vs $445 a week at the census.
Bateman ranks higher on the SEIFA advantage scale (decile 10 vs 7).
Murdoch is the greener of the two (20% vs 8% tree canopy).
Growth since 2011: Bateman +3%, Murdoch +1%.
In short
The two sit about 1.6 km apart in a straight line, both in Western Australia.
Share this comparison: X · Facebook · LinkedIn · or link it: https://suburby.com.au/compare/wa/bateman-vs-murdoch