Mitcham vs Vermont VIC
Two Victoria suburbs, about 2.1 km apart, side by side — straight from the official numbers.
The numbers
| Mitcham | Vermont | |
|---|---|---|
| Population (2021) | 16,795 | 10,993 |
| Median age | 39 | 40 |
| Median house price | $1,180,000 | $1,288,000 |
| Median unit price | $825,000 | $934,000 |
| Median rent (weekly) | $406 | $426 |
| Owner-occupied | 71% | 80% |
| Family households | 71% | 79% |
| SEIFA advantage (decile of 10) | 10 | 9 |
| Tree canopy | 20% | 19% |
| Population 2011 | 14,811 | 9,902 |
What stands out
Vermont's median house price is about 9% above Mitcham's.
Mitcham rents cheaper — $406 vs $426 a week at the census.
Mitcham ranks higher on the SEIFA advantage scale (decile 10 vs 9).
Growth since 2011: Mitcham +13%, Vermont +11%.
In short
On the median house price Mitcham is the cheaper of the two, $1,180,000 against $1,288,000. The two sit about 2.1 km apart in a straight line, both in Victoria.
Share this comparison: X · Facebook · LinkedIn · or link it: https://suburby.com.au/compare/vic/mitcham-vs-vermont