Lancefield vs Romsey VIC
Two Victoria suburbs, about 8.8 km apart, side by side — straight from the official numbers.
The numbers
| Lancefield | Romsey | |
|---|---|---|
| Population (2021) | 2,743 | 5,797 |
| Median age | 41 | 38 |
| Median house price | $670,000 | $785,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $562,500 |
| Median rent (weekly) | $360 | $380 |
| Owner-occupied | 88% | 88% |
| Family households | 78% | 81% |
| SEIFA advantage (decile of 10) | 6 | 7 |
| Tree canopy | 27% | 17% |
| Population 2011 | 2,357 | 4,412 |
What stands out
Romsey's median house price is about 17% above Lancefield's.
Lancefield rents cheaper — $360 vs $380 a week at the census.
Romsey ranks higher on the SEIFA advantage scale (decile 7 vs 6).
Lancefield is the greener of the two (27% vs 17% tree canopy).
Growth since 2011: Lancefield +16%, Romsey +31%.
In short
On the median house price Lancefield is the cheaper of the two, $670,000 against $785,000. The two sit about 8.8 km apart in a straight line, both in Victoria.
Share this comparison: X · Facebook · LinkedIn · or link it: https://suburby.com.au/compare/vic/lancefield-vs-romsey