Beaconsfield Upper vs Emerald VIC
Two Victoria suburbs, about 8.3 km apart, side by side — straight from the official numbers.
The numbers
| Beaconsfield Upper | Emerald | |
|---|---|---|
| Population (2021) | 2,997 | 5,890 |
| Median age | 42 | 43 |
| Median house price | $1,010,000 | $902,500 |
| Median rent (weekly) | $368 | $400 |
| Owner-occupied | 94% | 91% |
| Family households | 88% | 80% |
| SEIFA advantage (decile of 10) | 10 | 8 |
| Tree canopy | 56% | 58% |
| Population 2011 | 2,843 | 5,813 |
What stands out
Beaconsfield Upper's median house price is about 12% above Emerald's.
Beaconsfield Upper rents cheaper — $368 vs $400 a week at the census.
Beaconsfield Upper ranks higher on the SEIFA advantage scale (decile 10 vs 8).
Growth since 2011: Beaconsfield Upper +5%, Emerald +1%.
In short
On the median house price Emerald is the cheaper of the two, $902,500 against $1,010,000. The two sit about 8.3 km apart in a straight line, both in Victoria.
Share this comparison: X · Facebook · LinkedIn · or link it: https://suburby.com.au/compare/vic/beaconsfield-upper-vs-emerald