Torrensville vs Underdale SA
Two South Australia suburbs, about 0.9 km apart, side by side — straight from the official numbers.
The numbers
| Torrensville | Underdale | |
|---|---|---|
| Population (2021) | 4,110 | 2,429 |
| Median age | 37 | 38 |
| Median house price | $1,559,000 | $1,551,000 |
| Median rent (weekly) | $360 | $310 |
| Owner-occupied | 61% | 60% |
| Family households | 64% | 62% |
| SEIFA advantage (decile of 10) | 7 | 7 |
| Tree canopy | 10% | 10% |
| Population 2011 | 3,867 | 2,251 |
What stands out
Median house prices are close to level ($1,559,000 vs $1,551,000).
Underdale rents cheaper — $310 vs $360 a week at the census.
Both sit in the same SEIFA advantage decile (7 of 10).
Growth since 2011: Torrensville +6%, Underdale +8%.
In short
On the median house price Underdale is the cheaper of the two, $1,551,000 against $1,559,000. The two sit about 0.9 km apart in a straight line, both in South Australia.
Share this comparison: X · Facebook · LinkedIn · or link it: https://suburby.com.au/compare/sa/torrensville-vs-underdale