Mitchell Park vs Tonsley SA
Two South Australia suburbs, about 0.7 km apart, side by side — straight from the official numbers.
The numbers
| Mitchell Park | Tonsley | |
|---|---|---|
| Population (2021) | 5,754 | 743 |
| Median age | 37 | 31 |
| Median house price | $1,170,500 | $800,000 |
| Median rent (weekly) | $278 | $330 |
| Owner-occupied | 48% | 56% |
| Family households | 56% | 50% |
| SEIFA advantage (decile of 10) | 2 | 4 |
| Tree canopy | 11% | 6% |
| Population 2011 | 5,207 | — |
What stands out
Mitchell Park's median house price is about 46% above Tonsley's.
Mitchell Park rents cheaper — $278 vs $330 a week at the census.
Tonsley ranks higher on the SEIFA advantage scale (decile 4 vs 2).
Mitchell Park is the greener of the two (11% vs 6% tree canopy).
In short
On the median house price Tonsley is the cheaper of the two, $800,000 against $1,170,500. The two sit about 0.7 km apart in a straight line, both in South Australia.
Share this comparison: X · Facebook · LinkedIn · or link it: https://suburby.com.au/compare/sa/mitchell-park-vs-tonsley