Manningham vs Vale Park SA
Two South Australia suburbs, about 1 km apart, side by side — straight from the official numbers.
The numbers
| Manningham | Vale Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Population (2021) | 1,391 | 2,452 |
| Median age | 39 | 42 |
| Median house price | $1,150,000 | $1,478,000 |
| Median rent (weekly) | $320 | $410 |
| Owner-occupied | 72% | 77% |
| Family households | 71% | 76% |
| SEIFA advantage (decile of 10) | 9 | 10 |
| Tree canopy | 10% | 13% |
| Population 2011 | 1,295 | 2,158 |
What stands out
Vale Park's median house price is about 29% above Manningham's.
Manningham rents cheaper — $320 vs $410 a week at the census.
Vale Park ranks higher on the SEIFA advantage scale (decile 10 vs 9).
Growth since 2011: Manningham +7%, Vale Park +14%.
In short
On the median house price Manningham is the cheaper of the two, $1,150,000 against $1,478,000. The two sit about 1 km apart in a straight line, both in South Australia.
Share this comparison: X · Facebook · LinkedIn · or link it: https://suburby.com.au/compare/sa/manningham-vs-vale-park