Casula vs Lurnea NSW
Two New South Wales suburbs, about 1.8 km apart, side by side — straight from the official numbers.
The numbers
| Casula | Lurnea | |
|---|---|---|
| Population (2021) | 16,584 | 10,057 |
| Median age | 36 | 32 |
| Median rent (weekly) | $450 | $380 |
| Owner-occupied | 66% | 56% |
| Family households | 81% | 78% |
| SEIFA advantage (decile of 10) | 4 | 1 |
| Tree canopy | 14% | 5% |
| Population 2011 | 14,696 | 8,610 |
What stands out
Lurnea rents cheaper — $380 vs $450 a week at the census.
Casula ranks higher on the SEIFA advantage scale (decile 4 vs 1).
Casula is the greener of the two (14% vs 5% tree canopy).
Growth since 2011: Casula +13%, Lurnea +17%.
In short
The two sit about 1.8 km apart in a straight line, both in New South Wales.
Share this comparison: X · Facebook · LinkedIn · or link it: https://suburby.com.au/compare/nsw/casula-vs-lurnea