O'connor vs Turner ACT
Two Australian Capital Territory suburbs, about 1.2 km apart, side by side — straight from the official numbers.
The numbers
| O'connor | Turner | |
|---|---|---|
| Population (2021) | 5,917 | 4,470 |
| Median age | 35 | 31 |
| Median rent (weekly) | $451 | $480 |
| Owner-occupied | 61% | 44% |
| Family households | 63% | 47% |
| SEIFA advantage (decile of 10) | 10 | 10 |
| Tree canopy | 25% | 14% |
| Population 2011 | 5,251 | 3,595 |
What stands out
O'connor rents cheaper — $451 vs $480 a week at the census.
Both sit in the same SEIFA advantage decile (10 of 10).
O'connor is the greener of the two (25% vs 14% tree canopy).
Growth since 2011: O'connor +13%, Turner +24%.
In short
The two sit about 1.2 km apart in a straight line, both in Australian Capital Territory.
Share this comparison: X · Facebook · LinkedIn · or link it: https://suburby.com.au/compare/act/o-connor-vs-turner