Banks vs Conder ACT
Two Australian Capital Territory suburbs, about 1.4 km apart, side by side — straight from the official numbers.
The numbers
| Banks | Conder | |
|---|---|---|
| Population (2021) | 5,100 | 5,108 |
| Median age | 35 | 37 |
| Median rent (weekly) | $424 | $390 |
| Owner-occupied | 82% | 82% |
| Family households | 79% | 81% |
| SEIFA advantage (decile of 10) | 8 | 9 |
| Tree canopy | 5% | 17% |
| Population 2011 | 5,060 | 5,313 |
What stands out
Conder rents cheaper — $390 vs $424 a week at the census.
Conder ranks higher on the SEIFA advantage scale (decile 9 vs 8).
Conder is the greener of the two (17% vs 5% tree canopy).
Growth since 2011: Banks +1%, Conder -4%.
In short
The two sit about 1.4 km apart in a straight line, both in Australian Capital Territory.
Share this comparison: X · Facebook · LinkedIn · or link it: https://suburby.com.au/compare/act/banks-vs-conder